Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pain. 2016 Oct;157(10):2375–2381. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000660

Table 1.

Descriptive Data for FAP and Healthy Youth

FAP (n = 63) Healthy Youth (n = 77) FAP vs. Healthy Youth
N (%) N (%) X2

Sex 3.6
 Male 21 (33) 38 (49)
 Female 42 (67) 39 (51)
Race 19.6**
 Caucasian 53 (84) 37 (48)
 Non-Caucasian 10 (16) 40 (52)

M (SD) M (SD) t

Age 14.4 (1.9) 14.8 (1.8) 1.25
Somatic symptoms 30.8 (16.0) 8.2 (7.0) 10 43***
Functional disability 11.3 (7.4) 2.3 (5.1) 8.18***
CPM task
 P-60 temperature 46.8 (2.0) 46.8 (1.6) 0.16
 Pre-conditioning (mean) 58.2 (17.1) 59.8 (13.3) 0.61
 Pre-conditioning 10 s 61.6 (16.7) 64.2 (14.4) 0.98
 Pre-conditioning 20 s 57.9 (19.5) 58.7 (15.3) 0.27
 Pre-conditioning 30 s 54.5 (23.9) 56.2 (17.7) 0.50
-----10 minute break-----
 Water bath 0 s 32.6 (24.1) 31.4 (22.5) 0.30
 Water bath 10 s 37.2 (26.5) 35.2 (25.3) 0.45
 Water bath 20 s 39.7 (25.9) 31.1 (23.0) 2.02*
 Conditioning 40 s 60.9 (18.7) 55.5 (18.8) 1.64
 Conditioning 50 s 55.9 (17.7) 46.3 (20.3) 2.84**
 Conditioning 60 s 51.1 (22.9) 39.9 (20.0) 2.96**
***

p < .001;

**

p < .01;

*

p<.05.

FAP = functional abdominal pain; CPM = conditioned pain modulation; CPM pain ratings were made on a 0 – 100 scale; s = seconds.