Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 20;6:33762. doi: 10.1038/srep33762

Table 2. The ROC analysis in stratified five-fold cross-validation for evaluating the accuracy of the combined diagnostic model*.

  Discrimination between PD and healthy subjects
  Discrimination between Early PD and healthy subjects
AUC 95% CI of AUC
Cut-off Point Sensitivity Specificity AUC 95% CI of AUC
Cut-off Point Sensitivity Specificity
Lower Bound Upper Bound Lower Bound Upper Bound
Fold 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.466 100.0% 100.0% Fold 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.457 100.0% 100.0%
Fold 2 0.969 0.876 1.000 0.729 87.5% 100.0% Fold 2 0.938 0.762 1.000 0.601 75.0% 100.0%
Fold 3 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.493 100.0% 100.0% Fold 3 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.468 100.0% 100.0%
Fold 4 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.498 100.0% 100.0% Fold 4 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.492 100.0% 100.0%
Fold 5 0.969 0.876 1.000 0.495 87.5% 100.0% Fold 5 0.938 0.762 1.000 0.490 75.0% 100.0%
Mean 0.988 0.967 1.000 0.536 95.0% 100.0% Mean 0.975 0.933 1.000 0.502 90.0% 100.0%

*In every fold analysis within stratified five-fold cross-validation, FA-SNAv, CBF-PFCAv and FA-PWMAv were consistently selected into the combined diagnostic model.