Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 21;22(35):7892–7907. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i35.7892

Table 1.

Current treatment options in achalasia

Treatment option Pros Cons Success rate
Oral agents Non operative patients, on demand, dose adjustment Adverse events, low duration, not a definitive method 28%-66% reduction of LES pressure
Pneumatic dilation Short recovery, low procedure time, best non-surgical method Perforation, multiple procedures needed, post procedure reflux 66%-90% 1 yr and 48% 10 yr
Heller myotomy Most durable effect Not applicable for high risk surgical patients, post-surgical reflux, anesthesia required 93% 1 yr
69%-80% 10 yr
Self-expanding metal stent Good palliative option, high risk surgical patients Expensive, stent migration, reflux (single center experience) 100% 1 mo,
83% 10 yr
POEM Non-surgical, -low and -high risk patients Complications (pneumothorax, reflux), not widely available, expertise 5%-62% reduction of LES pressure

Modified from Krill et al[90] and Dobrowolsky et al[92].