Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 20;6:33470. doi: 10.1038/srep33470

Figure 5. Y1R deletion impairs osteoclast resorption activity.

Figure 5

The generation of 3D reconstructions of WT (A) and Y1R−/− (B) resorption pits revealed striking morphological differences. The analysis of these 3D reconstructions demonstrated that Y1R−/− resorption pits exhibit a decreased top section area (C), pit size (D), depth (E) and volume (F). Moreover, an increase on Y1R−/− pit depth is not accompanied by augmented top section area (G) or volume (H). Although the mean aspect ratio of Y1R−/− resorption pits was not different from WT (I), the frequency distribution of Y1R−/− resorption pits revealed a shift towards less circular pits than WT (J), which did not alter with increases in pit volume (K). Data is expressed as mean ± SEM. ***p < 0.001 different from WT.