Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 20;16:494. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1761-3

Table 3.

Logistic regression model predicting the odds of utilizing integrated HIV and SRH services by women in Uganda

Variable/category Model 1 (combined) Model 2 (Rural) Model 3 (Urban)
Odds ratio 95 % CI Odds ratio 95 % CI Odds ratio 95 % CI
Rural/urban residence
 Urban rc 1.000 - - - - -
 Rural 1.118 [0.9-1.3] - - - -
Age group
 15-19 rc 1.000 - - - - -
 20-24 ***2.130 [1.8-2.6] ***2.039 [1.7-2.5] ***2.43 [1.5-4.0]
 25-29 ***2.526 [2.1-3.1] ***2.434 [2.0-3.0] ***2.87 [1.7-4.8]
 30-34 ***1.521 [1.2-1.9] ***1.514 [1.2-1.9] 1.55 [0.9-2.7]
 35-39 0.874 [0.7-1.1] 0.943 [0.8-1.2] *0.62 [0.4-1.1]
 40-44 ***0.375 [0.3-0.5] ***0.401 [0.3-0.5] ***0.25 [0.1-0.5]
 45-49 ***0.146 [0.1-0.2] ***0.156 [0.1-0.2] ***0.08 [0.0-0.2]
Education level
 None rc 1.000 - - - - -
 Primary **1.220 [1.0-1.4] **1.222 [1.0-1.4] 1.49 [0.9-2.4]
 At least secondary *1.190 [1.0-1.4] 1.194 [1.0-1.5] 1.43 [0.9-2.3]
Marital status
 Never married rc 1.000 - - - - -
 Currently married ***6.613 [5.5-8.0] ***5.785 [4.6-7.2] ***9.01 6.3-13.0]
 Previously married ***3.369 [2.7-4.2] ***3.035 [2.4-3.9] ***4.27 2.8-6.6]
Wealth indicator
 Poor rc 1.000 - - - - -
 Middle 0.982 [0.8-1.1] 0.982 [0.8-1.1] 1.04 [0.3-4.2]
 Richer 0.921 [0.8-1.1] 0.960 [0.8-1.1] 0.41 [0.1-1.3]
Region of residencea
 Kampala rc 1.000 - - - - -
 Central **1.337 [1.0-1.7] - - **1.56 [1.1-2.2]
 Eastern 0.895 [0.7-1.1] ***0.699 [0.6-0.8] 0.96 [0.7-1.4]
 Northern ***1.572 [1.2-2.0] ***1.302 [1.1-1.6] 0.92 [0.6-1.4]
 Western 1.163 [0.9-1.5] 0.907 [0.8-1.1] 1.20 [0.8-1.8]
Model constant ***0.186 [0.1-0.3] ***0.289 [0.2-0.4] **0.28 [0.1-1.0]
Number of cases 9691 7707 1984
F-statistic 82.1 73.1 18.1
Model significance (p) 0.000 0.000 0.000

Note

*** significant at p < 1 %; ** significant at p < 5 %; * significant at p < 10 %

a For the variable region of residence in model 1 (combined) Kampala is reference category, while in model 2 (rural) Central region is the reference category

rc reference category