. 2015 Nov 27;10(6):1514–1526. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.204

Table 1. Summary of differences in mycorrhizal functionality (F ratio from ANOVA) between Neohodgsonia, Alisonia, Haplomitrium, Treubia, Preissia and Marchantia at elevated a[CO₂] (1500 p.p.m.) and ambient a[CO₂] (440 p.p.m.).

	df	Plant species	CO₂ treatment	Species × CO₂
Biomass (g)	1, 30	16.276***	18.911***	1.937
Fungal carbon in cores (ng)a	1, 54	14.042***	31.334***	5.087***
Percentage of carbon allocationb	1, 54	5.756***	13.900***	3.278*
Total ³³P uptake (ng)b	1, 30	4.498**	5.714*	6.483***
[³³P] in plant tissue (ng g⁻¹)	1, 36	6.259***	3.142	3.857*
Total ¹⁵N uptake (ng)	1, 20	1.889	0.953	0.822
[¹⁵N] in plant tissue (ng g⁻¹)a	1, 20	0.235	1.147	1.304
³³P-for-C efficiency (ng ng⁻¹)	1, 36	46.220***	0.885	31.747***
¹⁵N-for-C efficiency (ng ng⁻¹)	1, 20	0.413	13.523**	1.913

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; p.p.m., parts per million. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001; post-hoc Tukey's test.

Data have been log₁₀ transformed to meet the assumptions for ANOVA.

Data have been arcsine-square-root transformed to meet the assumptions for ANOVA.

Table 1. Summary of differences in mycorrhizal functionality (F ratio from ANOVA) between Neohodgsonia, Alisonia, Haplomitrium, Treubia, Preissia and Marchantia at elevated a[CO2] (1500 p.p.m.) and ambient a[CO2] (440 p.p.m.).