Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 1;29(5):433–439. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000298

Table 1.

Median clinical sensitivity of PCR methods for detection of spotted fever group and typhus group rickettsia in blood and skin/eschar biopsy samplesa

Percentage clinical sensitivity
Sample Rickettsia Method Number of assays Median (IQR) References
All PanRick All 145 23 (15–34) [43,, 44,54]
SFGR 331 48 (34–65) [53, 54]
TGR 257 5 (3–7) [43,44]
Skin All All 233 43 (7–55) [43,54]
SFGR 101 67 (55–79)
TGR 88 6 (5–6)
Blood All All 331 18 (4–30) [43,44]
PanRick 101 18 (12–23)
SFGR 230 42 (24–56)
TGR 169 3 (2–10)
All PanRick Real-time PCR 525 7 (4–23) [43,44]
SFGR Real-time PCR 123 23 (14–33)
TGR Real-time PCR 257 5 (3–7)
SFGR Nested PCR 29 31 (31–31) [53]
SFGR Conventional PCR 179 69 (61–80) [53, 54]

aDerived from studies for which serologic and PCR results on more than 10 patients were reported since 2013 identified using search terms ‘rickettsia’, ‘spotted fever’, ‘typhus’ and ‘PCR’, ‘real-time PCR’, ‘nested-PCR’, ‘qPCR’, ‘quantitative PCR’. PanRick – assays that target the genus Rickettsia; SFGR – assays that target spotted fever group rickettsiae; TGR – assays that target typhus group rickettsiae. Number of assays column includes total assays reported, including some on the same samples but different approaches or targets. IQR, interquartile range.