Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 7;97(19):1628–1634. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00030

TABLE IV.

Mean Differences in the Orthogonal, Oblique, and RAND-36 HSI Summary Scores Between Baseline or Preoperative and Follow-up SF-36 Results*

Oblique – Orthogonal
RAND-36 – Orthogonal
Mean ΔPCS Mean ΔMCS Mean ΔPCS Mean ΔMCS
Baseline or preop. results 2.77 −5.34 1.57 −5.91
Follow-up results 2.48 −2.50 1.41 −2.05
Difference (95% CI) 0.29 (−0.61, 1.19) −2.84 (−3.77, −1.90) 0.16 (−0.55, 0.88) −3.86 (−4.84, −2.89)
*

Mean differences in the orthogonal, oblique, and RAND-36 HSI summary scores between baseline or preop. and follow-up SF-36 results. The studies tabulated in Table III were averaged to demonstrate that the oblique scoring method increased the PCS by 2.77 points for preop./baseline values or 2.48 points for follow-up values. The minimal clinically important difference for the SF-36 is 3 points27.

Paired-sample t test. CI = confidence interval.