TABLE IV.
Mean Differences in the Orthogonal, Oblique, and RAND-36 HSI Summary Scores Between Baseline or Preoperative and Follow-up SF-36 Results*
Oblique – Orthogonal |
RAND-36 – Orthogonal |
|||
Mean ΔPCS | Mean ΔMCS | Mean ΔPCS | Mean ΔMCS | |
Baseline or preop. results | 2.77 | −5.34 | 1.57 | −5.91 |
Follow-up results | 2.48 | −2.50 | 1.41 | −2.05 |
Difference (95% CI)† | 0.29 (−0.61, 1.19) | −2.84 (−3.77, −1.90) | 0.16 (−0.55, 0.88) | −3.86 (−4.84, −2.89) |
Mean differences in the orthogonal, oblique, and RAND-36 HSI summary scores between baseline or preop. and follow-up SF-36 results. The studies tabulated in Table III were averaged to demonstrate that the oblique scoring method increased the PCS by 2.77 points for preop./baseline values or 2.48 points for follow-up values. The minimal clinically important difference for the SF-36 is 3 points27.
Paired-sample t test. CI = confidence interval.