Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 20.
Published in final edited form as: Ecol Soc. 2016 Mar;21(1):2. doi: 10.5751/ES-08092-210102

Table 1.

Objective Data collection Nr villages Variable Descriptive statistics
To describe the Tsimane’ management regime of G. deversa as currently practiced Field visits and open-ended interviews 3 villages n Mean SD Min Max
Age 15 35.00 10.38 21 49
Sex 10 men (66.67%)
5 women (33.33%)
To examine whether there is concordance between local perceptions of G. deversa availability and estimates of availability obtained from ecological data in the Tsimane’ Territory Structured interviews 13 villages n Mean SD Min Max
Age 296 38.35 17.80 14 88
Sex 142 men (47.97%)
154 women (52.03%)
Focus groups 2 villages Age n Mean SD Min Max
16 36.53 15.58 19 70
Sex 9 men (56.25%)
7 women (43.75%)
To analyze whether different perceptions of G. deversa availability and change explain harvesting behavior and local management in general Semi-structured interviews 2 villages n Mean SD Min Max
Age 97 40.07 20.32 16 84
Sex 53 men (54.64%)
44 women (45.36%)