Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 14;7(17):23668–23683. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8056

Table 1. Associations between miR-16 and IKBKB expression levels and the clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patients.

Variables Cases (n) miR-16
Expression (n)
P value IKBKB
Expression (n)
P value
Low High Low High
Age (years) 0.129 0.060
 <50 56 36 20 26 30
 ≥50 34 27 7 9 25
Pathological classification 0.275 0.351
 Invasive ductal carcinoma 59 44 15 20 39
 Invasive lobular carcinoma 16 11 5 7 9
 Medullary carcinoma 15 8 7 8 7
Pathological grade * 0.953 0.663
 I 8 6 2 3 5
 II 37 28 9 11 26
 III 14 10 4 6 8
T staging 0.021 <0.001
 T1+T2 65 41 24 34 31
 T3+T4 25 22 3 1 24
Lymph node metastasis 0.059 <0.001
 No 43 26 17 27 16
 Yes 47 37 10 8 39
Distant metastasis 0.537 0.100
 No 75 51 24 32 43
 Yes 15 12 3 3 12
Clinical staging 0.711 0.008
 I 13 8 5 10 3
 II 48 34 14 19 29
 III 14 9 5 3 11
 IV 15 12 3 3 12
*

The correlation between miR-16/IKBKB expression and pathological grade were only analyzed in 59 cases of Invasive ductal carcinoma patients.