Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 22;7(17):24744–24751. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8271

Table 3. Correlation of EGFR expression and FISHa and the clinical features.

Characteristics Patients (n=62) EGFR overexpression (n=51) EGFR FISH (n=22)
No. (%) No./Subgroup (%) P value No./Subgroup (%) P value
Age (year)
 <=65 47 (75.8) 36/47 (76.6) 0.052b 17/47 (36.2) 0.842
 >65 15 (24.2) 15/15 (100.0) 5/15 (33.3)
Gender
 Male 50 (80.6) 39/50 (78.0) 0.102b 18/50 (36.0) 1.000b
 Female 12 (19.4) 12/12 (100.0) 4/12 (33.3)
Performance status
 0-1 59 (95.2) 48/59 (81.4) 1.000b 22/59 (37.3) 0.546b
 2 3 (4.8) 3/3 (100.0) 0/3 (0.0)
Smoking
 Never 23 (37.1) 22/23 (95.7) 0.042b 8/23 (34.8) 0.929
 Ever 39 (62.9) 29/39 (74.4) 14/39 (35.9)
Histologic grade
 G1 6 (9.7) 5/6 (83.3) 0.305b 3/6 (50.0) 0.004b
 G2 17 (27.4) 12/17 (70.6) 11/17 (64.7)
 G3 39 (62.9) 34/39 (87.2) 8/39 (20.5)
No. of previous chemotherapy
 None or 1 43 (69.4) 41/43 (95.3) <0.001b 15/43 (34.9) 0.882
 2 or more 19 (30.6) 10/19 (52.6) 7/19 (36.8)
Disease extent
 Locally advanced 6 (9.7) 3/6 (50.0) 0.063b 2/6 (33.3) 1.000b
 Metastatic 56 (90.3) 48/56(85.7) 20/56 (35.7)
a

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

b

Tested byFisher's exact test