Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fam Relat. 2016 Apr;65(2):369–386. doi: 10.1111/fare.12194

Table 2.

Predictors of Treatment Compliance Status (n = 343)

Predictors Wald df p Odds
ratio
95%
Confidence
interval
Positive affect 3.91 1 .05 0.97 [0.93, 1.00]
CGC age 2.49 1 .12 1.09 [0.98, 1.20]
Number CGCs under CGM care 3.23 1 .07 0.81 [0.64, 1.02]
CGM age 5.04 1 .02 1.04 [1.01, 1.07]
CGM mental health services use 5.29 1 .02 1.92 [1.10, 3.37]
RCT site (ref.: Maryland) 4.47 3 .22
  Texas 1.85 1 .17 0.53 [0.21, 1.32]
  Ohio 1.55 1 .21 0.61 [0.28, 1.33]
  California 4.46 1 .04 0.38 [0.15, 0.93]
Control variable
  CGM married or not 0.21 1 .65 0.87 [0.47, 1.59]
  CGM employed or not 0.01 1 .91 0.97 [0.55, 1.71]
  CGM race (ref.: White) 0.36 2 .84
    Black 0.14 1 .71 1.13 [0.60, 2.14]
    Hispanic 0.30 1 .59 1.28 [0.52, 3.15]
CGM education 0.20 1 .65 1.07 [0.80, 1.44]
Family income 1.04 1 .31 1.27 [0.80, 2.01]

Note. CGC = custodial grandchild; CGM = custodial grandmother; ref. = reference category.