Table 3.

Logistic Regression of Timely Follow-up of Abnormal Screening Tests by Screening Type and Race/Ethnicity

Race/Ethnicity	OR (95% CI)
	Breast a	Breast b	Breast c	Colorectal a	Colorectal c
N total	N=17,739	N=6,564	N=6,447	n=22,805	n=22,598
N.H. white	1.00 (ref)	1.00 (ref)	1.00 (ref)	1.00 (ref)	1.00 (ref)
N.H. black	0.53 (0.41–0.69)	0.55 (0.42–0.72)	0.71 (0.51–0.97)	0.90 (0.82,0.99)	1.00 (0.90,1.10)
Hispanic	0.90 (0.66–1.22)	0.90 (0.64–1.27)	1.26 (0.87–1.84)	1.05 (0.98,1.14)	1.12 (1.04,1.21)
Asian/PI	0.71 (0.44–1.15)	0.66 (0.38–1.14)	0.67 (0.38–1.15)	1.00 (0.92,1.09)	0.98 (0.90,1.07)

^aLogistic regression model adjusted for study site, age, year of test. (All sites)

^bLogistic regression model adjusted for study site, age, year of test. (VT excluded).

^cLogistic regression model adjusted for study site, age, year of test, income (ZIP code median), and insurance (VT excluded from mammography analysis)

N.H., Non-Hispanic; PI, Pacific Islander