Table 4.
Table listing the slopes and correlation coefficient (r) as well as the ΔΔGelec RMSD for the various pairs of force fields. The values pertain to calculations without any minimization (TOP panel) as well as after 500 steps of minimization (BOTTOM panel). In each panel, the corresponding values are listed for the two dielectric assignment methods – TRADITIONAL (2-dielectric model) and GAUSSIAN.
Before Minimization | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slopes | Correlations | RMSD (kcal/mol) | ||||
TRADITIONAL | GAUSSIAN | TRADITIONAL | GAUSSIAN | TRADITIONAL | GAUSSIAN | |
CHARMM vs. AMBER |
1.05 | 0.78 | 0.819 | 0.729 | 40.71 | 88.89 |
CHARMM vs. OPLSAA |
1.07 | 0.43 | 0.815 | 0.731 | 43.18 | 92.93 |
AMBER vs. OPLSAA |
1.00 | 0.54 | 0.978 | 0.988 | 15.47 | 81.10 |
After Minimization for 500 steps | ||||||
Slopes | Correlations | RMSD (kcal/mol) | ||||
TRADITIONAL | GAUSSIAN | TRADITIONAL | GAUSSIAN | TRADITIONAL | GAUSSIAN | |
CHARMM vs. AMBER |
1.30 | 0.76 | 0.776 | 0.737 | 50.81 | 78.28 |
CHARMM vs. OPLSAA |
0.91 | 0.53 | 0.800 | 0.736 | 27.06 | 77.07 |
AMBER vs. OPLSAA |
0.62 | 0.69 | 0.908 | 0.983 | 40.51 | 49.66 |