Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2016 Aug 21;37(28):2495–2507. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24475

Table 4.

Table listing the slopes and correlation coefficient (r) as well as the ΔΔGelec RMSD for the various pairs of force fields. The values pertain to calculations without any minimization (TOP panel) as well as after 500 steps of minimization (BOTTOM panel). In each panel, the corresponding values are listed for the two dielectric assignment methods – TRADITIONAL (2-dielectric model) and GAUSSIAN.

Before Minimization
Slopes Correlations RMSD (kcal/mol)
TRADITIONAL GAUSSIAN TRADITIONAL GAUSSIAN TRADITIONAL GAUSSIAN
CHARMM
vs.
AMBER
1.05 0.78 0.819 0.729 40.71 88.89
CHARMM
vs.
OPLSAA
1.07 0.43 0.815 0.731 43.18 92.93
AMBER
vs.
OPLSAA
1.00 0.54 0.978 0.988 15.47 81.10
After Minimization for 500 steps
Slopes Correlations RMSD (kcal/mol)
TRADITIONAL GAUSSIAN TRADITIONAL GAUSSIAN TRADITIONAL GAUSSIAN
CHARMM
vs.
AMBER
1.30 0.76 0.776 0.737 50.81 78.28
CHARMM
vs.
OPLSAA
0.91 0.53 0.800 0.736 27.06 77.07
AMBER
vs.
OPLSAA
0.62 0.69 0.908 0.983 40.51 49.66