Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2016 Aug 21;37(28):2495–2507. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24475

Table 6.

For each force field, the ΔΔGelec RMSD for the various pairs of differently minimized structures are shown. The LEFT panels present the RMSD when bound/unbound states of monomeric chains were identical (‘Complex Minimized Only’) and the RIGHT panel presents the RMSD when monomers and their complexes were all individually minimized (non-identical bound/unbound state; ‘Complex + Chain Minimized’). NONMIN – protonated X-ray structures; MIN-500 – structures minimized for 500 CG steps and MIN-5000 – structures minimized for 5000 CG steps.

Comparison Within Same Force-Field using ΔΔGelec Pearson correlation and (RMSD)
(TRADITIONAL) | All RMSD values are in kcal/mol
Identical Bound/Unbound states Non-Identical Bound/Unbound states
NONMIN MIN-500 MIN-5000 NONMIN MIN-500 MIN-5000
CHARMM NONMIN 0 0.95
(28.59)
0.91
(38.54)
NONMIN 0 0.91
(30.73)
0.91
(35.63)
MIN-500 0 0.97
(12.88)
MIN-500 0 0.94
(15.51)
MIN-5000 0 MIN-5000 0
NONMIN MIN-500 MIN-5000 NONMIN MIN-500 MIN-5000
AMBER NONMIN 0 0.99
(10.16)
0.98
(10.57)
NONMIN 0 0.79
(42.59)
0.79
(42.53)
MIN-500 0 0.99
(2.94)
MIN-500 0 0.93
(19.95)
MIN-5000 0 MIN-5000 0
NONMIN MIN-500 MIN-5000 NONMIN MIN-500 MIN-5000
OPLS-AA NONMIN 0 0.92
(46.62)
0.91
(48.21)
NONMIN 0 0.51
(68.33)
0.47
(71.85)
MIN-500 0 0.99
(4.47)
MIN-500 0 0.79
(35.38)
MIN-5000 0 MIN-5000 0