Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 14;12:506–516. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.07.006

Table 3.

Pre and post neurofeedback differences in amygdala complex functional connectivity.

Amygdala Complex Seed Neurofeedback contrast Gyrus/Sulcus (BA) H Cluster size Beta values MNI coordinate
Z score t(20) p
x y z
Left BLA Pre > Post Dorsal PAG 63 0.033 0 − 26 − 10 2.81 3.16 0.002
Post > Pre ns
Right BLA Pre > Post ns
Post > Pre ns
Left CMA Pre > Post ns
Post > Pre ns
Right CMA Pre > Post ns
Post > Pre mPFC (10) 31 0.155 0 66 2 2.40 2.61 < 0 0.05
Left SFA Pre > Post PAG L 93 0.035 − 2 − 28 − 12 2.78 3.11 0.003
Anterior hippocampus L 81 0.060 − 28 − 22 − 8 2.71 3.02 0.003
Post > Pre ns
Right SFA Pre > Post ns
Post > Pre ns

Paired t-test for pre and post neurofeedback, examining amygdala complex functional connectivity as a follow up analysis from the ANOVA interaction, p-uncorrected < 0.005, k = 10. Asterisks indicates the a-priori region-of-interest analysis, p-FWE < 0.05, k = 10. Abbreviations: BA = Brodmann area, BLA = basolateral amygdala complex, CMA = centromedial amygdala complex, SFA = superficial amygdala complex, PAG = periaqueductal gray, mPFC = medial prefrontal cortex.