Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 28;10(9):1229–1242. doi: 10.1080/17435390.2016.1196251

Table 2. Physico-chemical properties of the studied nanomaterials (NMs were ≥99% pure).

NMs Provider Coating Shape Specific surface area [m2/g] Primary size (TEM) [nm] Hydrodynamic size in DI (DLS) [nm] pdi in DI ζ -potential in DI [mV]
SiO2* Nanologica No Spherical 910 ± 42 212 ± 52 854 ± 38 0.6 −37.9
Ag Colorobia PVP-stabilized Spherical n.d. 20.4 ± 6.8 132 ± 0.5 0.2 −10.6
Au** Inmetro Citrate Spherical n.d. 13.3 ± 0.8 23 ± 4 0.2 −48
MWCNT Nanocyl No Tubular 265 ± 18 diameter: 10.2 ± 0.5length: >1000*** n.a. n.a. n.a.
CuO Intrinsiq Materials No Spherical 23 ± 3.7 24.5 ± 2.3 152 ± 2 0.2 45.4
ZnO Nanogate No Spherical 58 ± 5 13.6 ± 1.7 102 ± 1 0.2 32.1
TiO2**** CCMB No Spherical 257 ± 47 <5 367 ± 60 0.4 14.2

*Mesoporous; **Acidic suspension (pH = 5.8); ***Measured by SEM; ****Anatase crystal structure with some rutile present according to XRD analysis. DI, deionized water; DLS, hydrodynamic light scattering; n.a., not applicable; PVP, polyvinyl-pyrrolidone; pdi, polydispersity index; SEM, scanning electron microscopy; TEM, transmission electron microscopy.