Table 1. Comparison of critical exponents of CrSiTe3 with different theoretical models (MAP = Modified Arrott plot; KFP = Kouvel-Fisher plot; cal = Calculated).
Composition | Ref. | Technique | β | γ | δ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrSiTe3 | This work | MAP | 0.170 ± 0.008 | 1.532 ± 0.001 | 10.012 ± 0.047cal |
KFP | 0.175 ± 0.009 | 1.562 ± 0.009 | 9.925 ± 0.056cal | ||
Critical isotherm | 9.917 ± 0.008 | ||||
14 | Neutron | 0.17 | |||
15 | Neutron | 0.151 ± 0.002 | |||
2D Ising | 20 | Theory | 0.125 | 1.75 | 15 |
Mean field | 18 | Theory | 0.5 | 1.0 | 3.0 |
3D Heisenberg | 18 | Theory | 0.365 | 1.386 | 4.8 |
3D XY | 18 | Theory | 0.345 | 1.316 | 4.81 |
3D Ising | 18 | Theory | 0.325 | 1.24 | 4.82 |
Tricritical mean field | 19 | Theory | 0.25 | 1.0 | 5 |
The errors represent the fitting error.