Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 20;48:70. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0249-2

Table 3.

Analysis of the Pig dataset using Gencont2 and Gencont

ΔF ΔG a Ave_relationshipb Number of selected candidatesa Timec Rd
0.05 129.55 0.28481 28 6.8 0.999
0.01 125.43 (125.39) 0.21259 73 (77) 6.5 0.986
0.005 124.37 (124.42) 0.20356 84 (90) 8.2 0.986
0.001 123.40 (123.44) 0.19634 103 9.3 0.990

Different levels of rate of inbreeding with respect to genetic gain (ΔG), number of selected individuals relative necessary computation time and correlation between assigned contributions

aIf there was a difference between the two algorithms, the result obtained with Gencont is shown in parentheses

bAverage relationship between selected candidates

cAmount of computation time necessary for Gencont2 expressed as the fraction of the time necessary for Gencont (in  %)

dCorrelation between assigned contributions