Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 20;48:70. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0249-2

Table 5.

Analysis of the Cattle dataset with 3907 male selection candidates under different combinations of restrictions on the minimal and maximal contributions with respect to genetic gain and optimal number of candidates to select

Cmin Cmax ΔG a Number of selected animalsa
0.0025 1.471 62 (65)
0.0050 1.471 51 (57)
0.01 1.437 100
0.02 1.464 (1.463) 76 (77)
0.03 1.470 74
0.04 1.472 (1.471) 75 (76)
0.05 1.472 (1.471) 75
0.0025 0.01 1.437 100
0.0025 0.02 1.462 68
0.0025 0.03 1.471 (1.470) 61 (62)
0.0025 0.04 1.471 64 (65)
0.0025 0.05 1.472 (1.471) 63 (65)
0.0050 0.01 1.437 100
0.0050 0.02 1.462 61
0.0050 0.03 1.470 (1.469) 53 (55)
0.0050 0.04 1.471 55 (56)
0.0050 0.05 1.471 57
0.0083 0.0083 1.429 120

Cmin = minimum contribution

Cmax = maximum contribution

ΔF=0.01

aIf there was a difference between the two algorithms, the result obtained with Gencont is shown in parentheses