Table 5.
a | Number of selected animalsa | ||
---|---|---|---|
0.0025 | – | 1.471 | 62 (65) |
0.0050 | – | 1.471 | 51 (57) |
– | 0.01 | 1.437 | 100 |
– | 0.02 | 1.464 (1.463) | 76 (77) |
– | 0.03 | 1.470 | 74 |
– | 0.04 | 1.472 (1.471) | 75 (76) |
– | 0.05 | 1.472 (1.471) | 75 |
0.0025 | 0.01 | 1.437 | 100 |
0.0025 | 0.02 | 1.462 | 68 |
0.0025 | 0.03 | 1.471 (1.470) | 61 (62) |
0.0025 | 0.04 | 1.471 | 64 (65) |
0.0025 | 0.05 | 1.472 (1.471) | 63 (65) |
0.0050 | 0.01 | 1.437 | 100 |
0.0050 | 0.02 | 1.462 | 61 |
0.0050 | 0.03 | 1.470 (1.469) | 53 (55) |
0.0050 | 0.04 | 1.471 | 55 (56) |
0.0050 | 0.05 | 1.471 | 57 |
0.0083 | 0.0083 | 1.429 | 120 |
= minimum contribution
= maximum contribution
aIf there was a difference between the two algorithms, the result obtained with Gencont is shown in parentheses