Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 20;48:70. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0249-2

Table 6.

Analysis of the Pig dataset with 2929 selection candidates under different combinations of restrictions on the minimum and maximum contributions with respect to genetic gain and optimal number of candidates to select

Cmin Cmax ΔG a Number of selected animalsa
0.0025 125.42 (125.39) 62 (68)
0.0050 125.34 (125.36) 48 (55)
0.01 123.77 (123.76) 102
0.02 124.97 (124.90) 84 (86)
0.03 125.19 (125.18) 81
0.04 125.34 (125.32) 78 (79)
0.05 125.37 77
0.0025 0.01 123.754 101
0.0025 0.02 125.05 (124.90) 76 (78)
0.0025 0.03 125.24 (125.18) 71 (73)
0.0025 0.04 125.33 (125.32) 70 (71)
0.0025 0.05 125.37 69
0.0050 0.01 124.97 100
0.0050 0.02 125.05 (124.90) 71
0.0050 0.03 125.24 (125.27) 66 (67)
0.0050 0.04 125.32 62
0.0050 0.05 125.54 (125.36) 56 (58)
0.0090 0.009 122.45 (122.36) 110

Cmin = minimum contribution

Cmax = maximum contribution

ΔF=0.01

aIf there was a difference between the two algorithms, the result obtained with Gencont is shown in parentheses