Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 1;30(9):958–962. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0341

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Left panel shows US image used for the S-mode stone width measurement as reported in our results (9.0 mm, in comparison to 18.4 mm on CT). The right panel shows an alternate image of the same stone that was initially felt to be spuriously large. The width measurement on the right panel is actually considerably closer (17.5 mm) to the CT size of the stone.