Table 1.

Correlations of alcohol outcomes with neighborhood variables and hypothesized mediators

	White respondents (weighted N=3,528 men; 3,571 women)
	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)	(7)	(8)
(1) NBH affluence	---	−0.59**	−0.16**	0.07**	−0.03	0.02	−0.04†	−0.04†
(2) NBH disadvantage	−0.58**	---	0.43**	−0.02	0.04	−0.01	0.01	0.04†
(3) NBH immigrant concentration	−0.19**	0.44**	---	0.02	0.02	−0.01	−0.02	0.01
(4) Pro-drinking attitudes	0.05*	−0.02	0.03	---	0.11**	−0.11**	0.55**	0.26**
(5) Depression	−0.03	0.06**	0.03	0.10**	---	−0.75**	0.11**	0.16**
(6) Positive affect	0.01	−0.05*	−0.02	−0.08**	−0.81**	---	−0.09**	−0.12**
(7) Heavy drinking volume	−0.05*	0.05*	0.01	0.44**	0.05*	−0.02	---	0.40**
(8) 2+ Negative consequences	−0.07**	0.09**	0.02	0.19**	0.09**	−0.07**	0.36**	---
	Minority respondents (weighted N=1,233 men; 967 women)
	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)	(7)	(8)
(1) NBH affluence	---	−0.66**	−0.39**	0.11**	−0.06*	0.09**	−0.06*	−0.09**
(2) NBH disadvantage	−0.61**	---	0.49**	−0.03	0.08*	−0.08*	0.12**	0.12**
(3) NBH immigrant concentration	−0.34**	0.46**	---	−0.07†	0.01	−0.07*	0.06*	0.01
(4) Pro-drinking attitudes	0.05	0.04	−0.01	---	0.13**	−0.05	0.36**	0.20**
(5) Depression	−0.12**	0.08*	0.04	0.12**	---	−0.70**	0.08**	0.26**
(6) Positive affect	0.11*	−0.07*	−0.04	−0.10**	−0.80**	---	−0.11**	−0.19**
(7) Heavy drinking volume	−0.06*	0.05	0.00	0.33**	0.08*	−0.08†	---	0.38**
(8) 2+ Negative consequences	−0.02	0.02	−0.03	0.10**	0.18**	−0.17*	0.29**	---

^**Note. p<.01,

^*p<.05,

^†p<.10. Correlations for men above diagonal; for women below.