Collisions |
France |
Roadside hedgerows searched weekly, on foot, May‐October 1998–2002 (24 months) |
Total 109 bats found dead |
Capo et al. (2006) |
Czech Republic |
Emergency stopping lanes searched approx. weekly, on foot, May‐October 2007 (6 months) |
Total 119 bats found dead |
Gaisler et al. (2009) |
Spain |
Lanes, hard shoulders and ditches searched weekly on foot, 1989 (12 months) |
Total 72 bats found dead |
Gonzalez‐Prieto et al. (1993) |
Germany |
Collated incidental records, 1945–1995 |
Total 307 bats found dead, 211 males and 96 females |
Haensel and Rackow (1996) |
Montenegro |
Two roads searched weekly by bike, August‐October 2013 (3 months) |
Total 17 bats found dead, 8 males and 5 females |
Iković et al. (2014) |
Germany |
Collated incidental records, 1964–1993 |
Total 96 bats found dead |
Kiefer et al. (1995) |
Poland |
Approx. weekly searches, May‐October 1994–2000 (36 months) |
Total 167 bats found dead, 30 males and 31 females, 56 juveniles and 29 adults |
Lesiński (2007) Method 1 |
Poland |
Irregular searches on several roads, 1992–1993 and 2001–2004 |
Lesiński (2007) Method 2 |
Poland |
Roadsides, searched approx. weekly, August‐September 2004 and April‐October 2005–2006 (16 months) |
Total 44 bats found dead, 9 males and 15 females |
Lesiński (2008) |
Poland |
Roadside, verges and ditches searched weekly, by car and by foot, July 2008‐June 2009 (11 months) |
Total 61 bats found dead, 20 males and 7 females, 17 adults and 8 juveniles |
Lesiński et al. (2010) |
Portugal |
Daily search of several roads by car, March‐October 2009 (7.5 months) |
Total 154 bats found dead, 44 males and 20 females, 99 adults and 17 juveniles |
Medinas et al. (2012) |
Germany |
Collated incidental records, 1951–1993 |
Total 61 bats found dead |
Rackow et al. (1994) |
Pennsylvania, USA |
Road and verges, searched approx. weekly, on foot May‐September 2001 (4 months) |
Total 29 bats found dead, 4 males and 16 females, 12 adults and 15 juveniles |
Russell et al. (2009) |
Roads as barriers |
Ireland |
Acoustic monitoring of bat activity at four types of motorway crossing: over‐road bridges (×6), severed treelines (×6), underpasses (×7) and river bridges (×6). Activity at crossing sites compared to that in adjacent landscape. Road width ~65–70 m, ~20000 vehicles per day |
Under‐road routes preferred to over‐road routes. An average of 23.5 fewer bat passes at over bridges, 7 fewer at severed treelines, 19.5 more passes at underpasses, 158 more passes beneath river bridges than compared to adjacent sites |
Abbott et al. (2012a,b) |
Ireland |
Acoustic monitoring of bat activity at three under‐road passageways of different dimensions: two narrow (H = 1.23 m, 1.1 m; W = 1.48 m, 1.4 m), one wide (H = 6 m, W = 16.6 m). Road width ~60–65 m, ~11000 vehicles per day |
Clutter‐adapted species less likely to use over‐road routes than open or edge‐adapted species. Clutter‐adapted species were also more likely to use the narrow under‐road passages |
Abbott et al. (2012a,b) |
Indiana, USA |
Crossing and avoidance behaviour of bats at five survey sites observed. Species identity, flight height, presence/absence of vehicles, and local ecology recorded |
Bats were more likely to avoid crossing a road in the presence of vehicles, in the absence of trees, with lower flight height (See Appendices S9 and S10) |
Bennett and Zurcher (2013) |
England |
Bat activity monitored acoustically at varying distances (0–1600 m) from a motorway, road width 35 m, 30–40000 vehicles per day |
Species diversity and bat activity declined with proximity to the road. Bat activity at 1600 m was 3.5 times that at the road |
Berthinussen and Altringham (2012b) |
England |
Road‐crossing behaviour monitored acoustically and by observers at four roads to compare frequency with which bats used underpasses, bat gantries and commuting routes. Flight height and verge height flew were also recorded |
Bats more likely to cross roads at unsafe heights than to use underpasses. Few bats crossed at gantries but where they did, most flew at unsafe heights (≤5 m). The height at which bats flew over the road was strongly correlated with verge height |
Berthinussen and Altringham (2012a) |
Germany |
Six Barbastella barbastellus (low flying and open adapted) and 34 Myotis bechsteinii (low flying and clutter adapted) were radio‐tracked. Mist‐netting conducted in three underpasses. Road width 18–23 m, 84000 vehicles per day |
More Barbastella barbastellus (5/6) crossed the road than Myotis bechsteinii (3/34). Most Barbastella barbastellus crossed above the road (21/37); all Myotis bechsteinii crossed at underpasses (36/36). Myotis bechsteinii foraging ranges were smaller closer to the road and females with smaller foraging areas had lower reproductive success |
Kerth and Melber (2009) |
California, USA |
Bat activity monitored acoustically at three sites, at incremental distances from the road. Road widths and traffic densities: 25–45 m and 55000 vehicles per day; 40 m and 86000 vehicles per day; 15 m and 33500 vehicles per day |
Activity was approximately twice as high 300 m from a road as at the road |
Kitzes and Merenlender (2014) |
Indiana, USA |
Road‐crossing behaviour (cross/avoid, flight height) at roads was observed at five sites and the presence/absence of vehicles, noise level emitted by vehicles and their speed were recorded |
Vehicles present: 40% (28/44) of bats crossed the road. Vehicles absent: 58% (103/167) of bats crossed. Noise level, speed of the vehicle and flight height had no effect on the tendency for bats to cross |
Zurcher et al. (2010) |