Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 28;16(9):5798–5805. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02548

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Tight binding eigenenergies of a 120 × 100 nm 2 graphene sample with open boundaries as a function of tip-induced potential amplitude Φ0el at B = 7 T with the tip-induced potential centered on an AB area (BA and AA yield very similar behavior, not shown). Line color encodes coupling to the boundary (imaginary part Γl of eigenenergies); black (red) indicates strong (weak) localization underneath the tip. States from LL±1 and the split LL0 are labeled by ±1 and 0, respectively. The LL0 splitting reduces the confining gap to E0E–1 ≈ 50 meV. First states crossing EF from LL±1 are highlighted in orange. Uncertainty in EF indicated as blue horizontal bar (Supporting Information). The green rectangle marks the zoom shown in panel e. (b–d) Color plot of the wave function amplitude Inline graphic of states marked by orange crosses in panel e. Φ0 at the crossing point εl0el) = EF is marked. Solid (dashed) white lines are line cuts along the dotted white line in panel b for contributions from sublattice A (B), as marked. All scale bars identical. (e) Zoom into area marked by a green box in panel a. Colored lines identify valley K (cyan) and K′ (purple). Orange crosses mark crossing of EF (blue dashed line) of selected states, which are displayed in panels b–d. First two orbital Δj and valley Δkτ splittings marked by arrows. (f) Comparison of length scales: tip-induced potential, magenta; calculated wave function amplitude |Ψ| of first state crossing EF (same as panel b) for sublattice A (gray line) and B (dashed line); superstructure lattice constant a = 13.8 nm; magnetic length lB (7 T) = 9.7 nm.