Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 29.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2016 Aug 17;335:151–169. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.08.019

Table 2.

There was no significant difference in locomotor activity between genotypes as measured by total centimeters travelled in the social approach chamber

Social approach test Source WT-M HT-M KO-M WT-F HT-F KO-F
New object vs. new PDE11A
 WT
Kelly et al. (2010),
PNAS
1862 (105) 1970 (86) 1753 (111) 1890
(167)
1542 (186) 2250
(516)
New object vs. new C57BL/6J Fig. 1D,E 1484 (54) 1576 (68) 1517 (50) 1629 (62) 1645 (79) 1786 (94)
New object vs. cagemate Fig. 2A 3078 (787) 4299
(1325)
2998 (953) 2525
(658)
3463 (969) 1744
(169)
Cagemate vs. new PDE11A
 WT
Fig. 2B 3393 (896) 6104
(2243)
3406
(1236)
3231
(826)
7241
(4062)
2297
(379)
Cagemate vs. new C57BL/6J Fig. 2C 3574
(1113)
6133
(1352)
2753 (757) 2865
(786)
2393 (570) 2682
(600)

Data expressed as mean (SEM).