Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 22;7:1429. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01429

Table 3.

Effect of diazotrophic bacteria on maize growth in the 2010/2011 season.

Treatments
% germination Dry weight (g) 2010/2011 season
Yield (kg ha-1)
N-Fertilizer (%) Bacteria 30 DAP 60 DAP 90 DAP
Control 35.3 a 18.85 a 143 bc 796.3 a 368.84 a
0 Enterobacter cloacae (L1) 58.9 abc 13.99 a 149 bc 588.8 a 432.18 ab
Bacillus megaterium (V16) 55.5 abc 14.03 a 129 ab 686.6 a 460.79 abc
Pantoea ananatis (LB5) 61.5 bc 15.73 a 124 a 783.4 a 448.53 abc
Bacillus ambifaria (V9) 69.5 c 17.12 a 146 c 731.6 a 468.97 abc
Pseudomonas sp. (StB5) 56.0 abc 17.55 a 145 bc 726.5 a 453.64 abc
33 Control 43.1 ab 17.01 a 160 c 730.4 a 509.83 bc
E. cloacae (L1) 67.2 bc 18.26 a 159 c 769.0 a 457.73 abc
B. megaterium(V16) 55.5 abc 19.49 a 155 bc 721.2 a 430.14 ab
P. ananatis (LB5) 68.9 c 17.48 a 153 bc 681.8 a 382.12 a
B. ambifaria (V9) 57.8 abc 15.91 a 161 c 666.6 a 430.14 ab
Pseudomonas sp. (StB5) 53.7 abc 17.23 a 161 c 720.0 a 443.42 ab
P = 0.056 P = 0.326 P = 0.764 P = 0.89 P = 0.055
CV% = 15.8 CV% = 18 CV% = 9.4 CV% = 20.9 CV% = 13.3

Means with the same letter in the same column are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.