Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 22;10:474. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00474

Table 4.

The results of interaction and the 2 student's t-test for them.

Connection from Ch no. to Ch no. Interaction effect Post-hoc
F statistics Sig. Partial η2 Pair-t-Test (T statistics; Sig.) CH minus CA Two sample-t-Test (T statistics; Sig.) younger minus older
Younger group Older group Chinese faces Caucasian faces
2 → 18 7.584 0.0068** 0.0585 −2.267 0.0269* 0.94 0.351 −2.486 0.0143* 1.236 0.2187
4 → 21 7.975 0.0056** 0.0614 −1.949 0.0559 1.865 0.067 −1.862 0.065 1.828 0.07
10 → 19 9.836 0.0021** 0.0746 −2.247 0.0283* 1.552 0.1257 −2.443 0.0160* 1.517 0.1318
25 → 3 8.223 0.0049** 0.0632 −1.987 0.0514 2.821 0.0064** −2.183 0.0310* 2.42 0.0170*
25 → 19 10.572 0.0015** 0.0798 −1.485 0.1428 1.737 0.0875 −2.382 0.0188* 0.452 0.6517
31 → 3 12.15 0.0006*** 0.0906 1.163 0.2495 −2.78 0.0072** 1.633 0.105 −2.575 0.0112*
39 → 5 10.231 0.0018** 0.0774 0.01 0.9921 3.353 0.0014** −3.045 0.0029** 0.499 0.6185
40 → 43 7.216 0.0082** 0.0558 2.082 0.0416* −1.24 0.2199 1.782 0.0773 −1.461 0.1466
36 → 5 8.553 0.0041** 0.0655 −0.102 0.9194 3.052 0.0034** −1.862 0.065 1.258 0.2109

The 2 student's t-test based on two divided groups, namely younger and older group. One was the Pair-T-test for younger group and older group, respectively, between own-race faces and other-race faces. The other was the Two-sample T-test for own-race and other-race, respectively, between younger group and older group.

*

Sig. < 0.05;

**

Sig. < 0.01;

***

Sig. < 0.001.