Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 1;35(10):2509–2516. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3187-z

Table 4.

Comparison of present UK study cohort to other published studies on childhood Behçet’s disease

Study (reference; country) No. of patients Male:female ratio Median age of onset (year) Percentage of patients in the series with each clinical features
OU (%) GU (%) Skin (%) Ocular (%) Pathergy (%) Arthralgia/arthritis (%) GI (%) NS (%) Vascular (%)
Present study 46 1:1.09 4.87 97.8 74 32.6 8.7 60a 52 58.7 32.6 6.5
Koné-Paut et al. (21; International) 110 1:0.96 8.2 83 61 57 33.9 44.7 N/A 26 29.3 13
P value 0.8608 0.0082 0.1434 0.0081 0.0012 0.6569 0.0002 0.7038 0.3984
Kitaichi et al. (20, Japan) 135 1:0.53 11.7 94.8 53.5 67.4 29 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
P value 0.0537 0.6816 0.0157 0.0001 0.0048
Kim et al. (19; Korea) 40 1:1.5 10.6 100 82.5 72.5 27.5 N/A 27.5 5 2.5 N/A
P value 0.5183 1.000 0.4370 0.0003 0.0259 0.0001 0.0278 0.0002
Karincaoglu et al. (8; Turkey) 83 1:1.18 12.3 100 81.9 N/A 34.9 37 39.8 4.8 7.2 16.8
P value 0.8554 0.3566 0.3664 0.0013 0.3703 0.1980 0.0001 0.0003 0.1110
Lang et al. (22; Canada) 37 1:0.947 8.7 100 75 84 30 N/A 54 40 32 16
P value 0.8267 1.0000 1.0000 0.0001 0.0204 1.0000 0.1244 1.0000 0.1783

P values were calculated by Fisher exact test. P values less than 0.05 (two-sided) were considered significant

OU oral ulceration, GU genital ulceration, GI gastrointestinal, NS nervous system, N/A data not available

aPathergy test was only performed in five patients, and was positive in 3/5