Table 2.
Method | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | |||||||||
Full data | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.50 | 1.01 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.23 |
Complete case | 1.07 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 1.05 | 0.51 | 1.04 | 0.77 | 1.01 | 1.15 |
FCS competing | 0.79 | 1.14 | 0.69 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.73 | 0.15 | 1.23 |
FCS compet inter | 0.96 | 1.12 | 0.64 | 0.40 | 0.53 | 0.63 | 0.78 | 0.31 | 1.14 |
FCS survival | 0.76 | 1.27 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.23 | 0.65 | 0.01 | 1.14 |
SMC-FCS competing | 1.02 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 1.02 | 0.51 | 1.03 | 0.77 | 1.01 | 1.20 |
SMC-FCS survival | 0.81 | 1.23 | 1.01 | 0.94 | 0.70 | 0.02 | 0.40 | 0.08 | 1.12 |
SD | |||||||||
Full data | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.34 |
Complete case | 0.37 | 0.44 | 0.27 | 0.39 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 0.16 | 0.25 | 0.81 |
FCS competing | 0.17 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.37 |
FCS compet inter | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.36 |
FCS survival | 0.17 | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.34 |
SMC-FCS competing | 0.19 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.14 | 0.22 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.38 |
SMC-FCS survival | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.14 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.36 |
Coverage | |||||||||
Full data | 94 | 96 | 96 | 95 | 96 | 96 | 94 | 94 | 93 |
Complete case | 94 | 95 | 94 | 95 | 94 | 95 | 94 | 95 | 82 |
FCS competing | 83 | 95 | 38 | 26 | 94 | 25 | 97 | 0 | 95 |
FCS compet inter | 97 | 95 | 51 | 44 | 96 | 61 | 96 | 2 | 89 |
FCS survival | 80 | 86 | 14 | 28 | 96 | 5 | 80 | 0 | 89 |
SMC-FCS competing | 94 | 94 | 94 | 96 | 95 | 95 | 94 | 94 | 92 |
SMC-FCS survival | 84 | 87 | 94 | 92 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87 |
CI indicates empirical coverage of nominal 95% confidence intervals.
.