Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 22.
Published in final edited form as: Rehabil Psychol. 2011 Nov;56(4):340–350. doi: 10.1037/a0025462

Table 2.

Goodness-of-Fit Indices for the Different Structural Equation Models

Full Sample (N = 213)
Model χ 2 df p CFI TLI AIC RMSEA RMSEA Lower 90% CI RMSEA Upper 90% CI
Model 1: Hypothesized Full Mediation Model 84.796 58 .012 .988 .981 176.796 .047 .022 .067
Model 2: Partial Mediation Model 84.682 56 .008 .987 .979 180.682 .049 .026 .070
Model 3: Alternative Mediation Model 130.770 57 <.001 .966 .946 224.770 .078 .061 .096
Remaining Sample after Excluding Moderate and Possibly Moderate TBIs (n = 199)
Model χ 2 df p CFI TLI AIC RMSEA RMSEA Lower 90% CI RMSEA Upper 90% CI
Model 1: Hypothesized Full Mediation Model 85.744 58 .010 .986 .978 177.744 .049 .024 .070
Model 2: Partial Mediation Model 85.660 56 .007 .985 .975 181.660 .052 .028 .073
Model 3: Alternative Mediation Model 130.046 57 <.001 .963 .940 224.046 .080 .062 .099

Note: df = degrees of freedom; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis Index; AIC = Akaike Information Criterion; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; CI = confidence interval.