Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 12;2016(2):CD005655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005655.pub2

Uva 1996.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: paired‐eye, randomized controlled trial
Number randomly assigned: 32 eyes of 16 participants; the fellow eye of each participant was the control
Exclusions after randomization: none reported
Losses to follow‐up: none reported
Number analyzed: 32 eyes of 16 participants
Unit of analysis: eye (both eyes per participant)
Handling of missing data: none
Sample size and power calculation: none reported
Participants Country: not reported
Mean age: not reported
Gender: not reported
Inclusion criteria: bilateral pigmentary glaucoma under medical therapy
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Equivalence of baseline characteristics: not reported
Interventions Laser: iridotomy using a yttrium–aluminum–garnet (YAG) laser
Control: no treatment
Length of follow‐up:
Planned: not reported
Actual: mean 28 months (range 12 to 37 months)
Outcomes Outcomes (primary and secondary outcomes not differentiated): change in IOP, progression of visual field damage, change in iris configuration measured by UBM, change in signs of pigmentary glaucoma (Krukenberg spindle, iris transillumination, trabecular meshwork pigmentation)
Intervals at which outcome assessed: not reported
Information on cost of interventions or quality of life: none reported
Notes Study period: not reported
Trial registration: none reported
Source of funding: not reported
Disclosures of interest: not reported
Subgroup analyses: none reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Investigators used a randomization table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of allocation concealment not reported
Masking of outcome assessors (detection bias)
Visual field Unclear risk Masking of visual field examiners not reported
Masking of outcome assessors (detection bias)
Intraocular pressure Unclear risk Masking of IOP assessors not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Investigators reported no participants lost to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol or clinical trial registration record was available for assessment of selective outcome reporting. All outcomes mentioned in the Methods section of the conference abstract were reported in the Results section
Other bias Low risk None identified

AGIS: Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study
IOP: intraocular pressure
mmHg: millimeter of mercury
UBM: ultrasound bio‐microscopy