Table 2.
Celecoxib 200 mg qd (n = 121) | Naproxen 500 mg bid (n = 107) | Placebo (n = 58) | |
---|---|---|---|
Baseline, mean (SE) | 65.1 (1.1) | 65.4 (1.1) | 63.7 (1.5) |
Week 6, mean (SE) | 21.7 (1.9) | 21.9 (2.0) | 25.6 (3.1) |
Change from baseline, LSM (SE) | −37.1 (2.0) | −37.5 (2.0) | −33.6 (2.6) |
Naproxen – celecoxib† | Naproxen – placebo | Celecoxib – placebo | |
---|---|---|---|
Difference in LSM (SE) | −0.4 (2.5) | −3.9 (3.0) | −3.5 (3.0) |
95% CI | −5.2 to 4.5 | −9.8 to 2.1 | −9.3 to 2.3 |
P‐value | 0.8791 | 0.2027 | 0.2403 |
†Celecoxib treatment was observed to be as effective as naproxen, based on the protocol requirements, since the lower‐bound of the two‐sided 95% CI of the treatment difference (naproxen–celecoxib) was above −10 mm (−5.2 mm). Change in VAS score from baseline to week 6 was analyzed using a generalized linear model with treatment and center effect in the model and baseline score as a covariate. bid, twice daily; qd, once daily; VAS, visual analogue scale; CI, confidence interval; LSM, least squares means; SE, standard error.