Skip to main content
. 2015 May 20;19(3):262–270. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12667

Table 2.

Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS in mm) at week 6 (efficacy‐evaluable population)

Celecoxib 200 mg qd (= 121) Naproxen 500 mg bid (= 107) Placebo (= 58)
Baseline, mean (SE) 65.1 (1.1) 65.4 (1.1) 63.7 (1.5)
Week 6, mean (SE) 21.7 (1.9) 21.9 (2.0) 25.6 (3.1)
Change from baseline, LSM (SE) −37.1 (2.0) −37.5 (2.0) −33.6 (2.6)
Naproxen – celecoxib Naproxen – placebo Celecoxib – placebo
Difference in LSM (SE) −0.4 (2.5) −3.9 (3.0) −3.5 (3.0)
95% CI −5.2 to 4.5 −9.8 to 2.1 −9.3 to 2.3
P‐value 0.8791 0.2027 0.2403

†Celecoxib treatment was observed to be as effective as naproxen, based on the protocol requirements, since the lower‐bound of the two‐sided 95% CI of the treatment difference (naproxen–celecoxib) was above −10 mm (−5.2 mm). Change in VAS score from baseline to week 6 was analyzed using a generalized linear model with treatment and center effect in the model and baseline score as a covariate. bid, twice daily; qd, once daily; VAS, visual analogue scale; CI, confidence interval; LSM, least squares means; SE, standard error.