Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 15;6(3):167–182. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1067365

TABLE 2.

Phenotypic Study 1 summary of arthropod abundance data from beat-sheet samples of MON 89788, the control, and the references at 3 US sites

      Quantitative differencesb
          Arthropod abundance
Arthropod Number of observations across sitesa Number of observations where no differences were detected between MON 89788 and A3244 Sitec Collection number MON 89788 Mean (SE)d A3244 Mean (SE)d Reference rangee
Pests              
Aphids (Aphididae) 8 8
Bean leaf beetle (Cerotoma trifurcata) 8 8
Corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea) 1 0 IL1 2 0.7 (0.3) 0.0 (nv) 0.0–0.0
Flea beetle (Chrysomelidae) 4 4
Garden fleahopper (Halticus bractatus) 1 1
Grape colaspis (Colaspis brunnea) 2 2
Green cloverworm (Plathypena scabra) 7 7
Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica) 1 1
Southern corn rootworm(Diabrotica undecimpunctata) 2 1 MO1 2 2.0 (nv) 0.0 (nv) 0.0–0.3
Stink bug (Pentatomidae) 5 5
Tarnished plant bug (Lygus spp.) 2 1 MO2 3 0.3 (0.3) 0.0 (nv) 0.0–0.0
Weevil (Curculionidae) 2 2
Beneficial              
Asian ladybeetle (Coccinellidae) 1 1
Lacewing (Chrysopidae) 1 1
Damsel bug (Nabidae) 7 7
Minute pirate bug (Orius spp.) 8 8
Pink spotted ladybeetle (Coccinellidae) 1 1
7-spotted ladybeetle (Coccinellidae) 1 1
Spider (Araneae) 6 6
a

A total of 68 arthropod abundance observations were made across sites. Detailed results are provided in Table S9.

b

Scores shown were statistically significant differences between MON 89788 and A3244 at p ≤ 0.05. – indicates that there were no differences detected between MON 89788 and A3244 for the arthropod indicated.

c

Site codes: IL1= Clinton Co., IL; MO1= Shelby Co., MO; MO2= Lincoln Co., MO (Table S2).

d

SE standard error, nv no variability.

e

Reference range = minimum and maximum mean values among the commercial reference varieties.