Table 4.

Penetration as a predictor of client-level outcomes

	Days using (n=5,685)		Emotional problems (n=5,697)
	B (SE)	95% CI lower, upper	B (SE)	95% CI lower, upper
Client penetration model
Organizational-level measure
Client penetration	0.003 (0.007)	(−0.011, 0.016)	−0.00004	(−0.0001, 0.0001)
Client-level measures
Outcome measure at intake	0.227 (0.013)	(0.201, 0.252)	0.323 (0.014)	(0.295, 0.351)
Age	0.363 (0.176)	(0.018, 0.709)	−0.002 (0.002)	(−0.005, 0.002)
African American	0.574 (1.064)	(−1.511, 2.659)	−0.013 (0.006)	(−0.025, −0.0002)
Hispanic	0.026 (0.948)	(−1.833, 1.884)	−0.024 (0.007)	(−0.039, −0.010)
Other race	−0.637 (0.927)	(−2.454, 1.180)	−0.006 (0.006)	(−0.018, 0.006)
Female	−2.140 (0.842)	(−3.791, −0.489)	0.025 (0.007)	(0.012, 0.038)
Criminal justice involvement	−0.585 (0.708)	(−1.972, 0.802)	0.006 (0.005)	(−0.004, 0.015)
Staff penetration model
Organizational-level measure
Staff penetration	0.0001 (0.0002)	(−0.0004, 0.0005)	0.0000 (0.00001)	(−0.00001, 0.00001)
Client-level measures
Outcome measure at intake	0.227 (0.013)	(0.201, 0.252)	0.323 (0.014)	(0.295, 0.351)
Age	0.363 (0.176)	(0.018, 0.709)	−0.002 (0.002)	(−0.005, 0.002)
African American	0.575 (1.064)	(−1.510, 2.662)	−0.013 (0.006)	(−0.025, −0.0002)
Hispanic	0.032 (0.947)	(−1.824, 1.889)	−0.024 (0.007)	(−0.039, −0.010)
Other race	−0.636 (0.927)	(−2.454, 1.181)	−0.006 (0.006)	(−0.018, 0.006)
Female	−2.141 (0.843)	(−3.793, −0.488)	0.025 (0.007)	(0.012, 0.038)
Criminal justice involvement	−0.583 (0.709)	(−1.972, 0.806)	0.006 (0.005)	(−0.004, 0.015)

Note: Bold indicates p<.05. Caucasian was the referent group for race.