Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 22;11(9):e0163056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163056

Table 1. Characteristics of patients and studies included in the meta-analysis comparing EUS-FNA with and without ROSE.

Reference year Country center design No. needle size, G age, years (mean±SD) male sex(%) lesion size (mm)
ROSE+ ROSE- ROSE+ ROSE- ROSE+ ROSE-
Alsohaibani 2009 Canada single R 102 22 61,range(26–86) 65,range(23–84) 27(49) 23(49) NR NR
eveland 2010 USA single R 247 22 NR NR NR NR NR NR
Iglesias-Garcia, 2011 Spain single R 182 22 62 range(24–84) 59 range(20–83) 57(60) 52(60) 31.7±13.6 30.7±12.9
Cermak 2012 USA single R 381 22 NR NR NR NR NR NR
Nayar 2013 UK single R 179 22/25 63.1±17 64.4±15 48(48.5) 41(50) 32.6±23 34.7±19
Ganc 2015 Brazil single R 48 22 NR NR NR NR NR NR
Wani 2015 USA multicenter RCT 241 22 66.1(10.2) 65.6(11.7) 74(61.2) 75(62.5) 3.3(1.4) 3.2(1.2)

R, retrospective; RCT, randomized controlled trial; NR, not reported.