Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep;76(9):972–977. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-109397

Table 2 Summary and overview of the interview statements.

Immigrants of Turkish origin Non-immigrant women
Commonalities
  • There are no differences among the groups with respect to feelings at the thought of labour pain.

  • The pregnant women in both groups reported with equal frequency that they obtained information on epidural analgesia from the internet/books or from a previous childbirth, if applicable.

  • The majority of the women take the decision for or against epidural analgesia without regard for their partnerʼs attitude.

Differences
Significance of labour pain
  • Labour pain is often considered to be meaningful.

  • Labour pain is not considered to be meaningful.

Attitudes towards epidural analgesia
  • The use of epidural analgesia is more frequently categorically rejected.

  • More frequent categorical acceptance of epidural analgesia.

Reasons for rejecting epidural analgesia
  • There are more often concerns about the procedure and the complications (paralysis, back pain).

  • For one-third of the women, a vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia is no longer a natural childbirth.

  • Over half the women expected that epidural analgesia would provide pain relief.

Sources of information on epidural analgesia
  • Information on epidural analgesia is frequently obtained from the social setting.

  • The obstetrician, childbirth course, etc. are frequent sources of information.