Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg. 2017 Feb;265(2):431–437. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001708

Table 4.

Surgery-Related and Postoperative Outcomes of the Propensity Score Matched Groups (n=470)

Characteristic Approach
P
Robotic
(n=172)
VATS
(n=141)
Open
(n=157)
Mortality 0 1 (1) 0 0.30
LOS, days, median (range) 4 (1–32) 4 (2–50) 5 (2–29) <0.001
Conversion to open 16 (9) 8 (6) 0.32
Conversion for bleeding 3 0
Conversion for other reasons 13a 8b
Sampled LN stations, median (range) 5 (0–8) 3 (0–7) 4 (1–8) <0.001
Cases with complications 51 (29.7) 35 (24.8) 47 (29.9) 0.55
Resection completeness 0.99
 R0 170 (99) 141 (100) 157 (100)
 R1 2 (1) 0 0
Pathologic type 0.82
 Adenocarcinoma 19 (11) 23 (16) 22 (14)
 Squamous cell carcinoma 91 (53) 69 (49) 73 (46)
 Carcinoid 39 (23) 30 (21) 40 (25)
 Other 23 (13) 19 (13) 22 (14)
Pathologic N category 0.64
 N0 145 (84) 121 (86) 137 (87)
 N1 20 (12) 14 (10) 11 (7)
 N2 7 (4) 6 (4) 9 (6)
Pathologic stage 0.13
 0-Ic 133 (77) 114 (81) 135 (86)
 II 29 (17) 21 (15) 12 (8)
 III/IVd 10 (6) 6 (4) 10 (6)

Data are no. (%) of patients, unless otherwise noted. LN, lymph node; LOS, length of stay in hospital; VATS, video-assisted thoracic surgery.

a

Due to extensive adhesion (5 cases), inadequate single lung ventilation (3 cases), technique inability to advance instrument through assistant ports (2 cases), poor visualization for delayed atelectasis and body habitus (1 case), technical problems with anesthesia machine (1 case), and enlarged but benign appearing hilar lymph nodes (1 case).

b

Due to extensive adhesion (1 case), inadequate single lung ventilation (2 cases), enlarged but benign appearing hilar lymph nodes (2 cases), unable to palpate lesions (2 cases), multiple lesions (1 case).

c

Two patients had stage 0 disease, both in the thoracotomy group.

d

One patient had stage IV disease (multiple pleural metastases) in the robotic group.