Table 2.
Bivariate Correlates of Affordable SLHs | Bivariate Correlates of High-cost SLHs | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Logistic Regression (N=2332) |
Zero-Truncated Poisson Regression (N=147) |
Logistic Regression (N=2332) |
Zero-Truncated Poisson Regression (N=49) |
|||||||||
OR | [95% CI] | p | IRR | [95% CI] | p | OR | [95% CI] | p | IRR | [95% CI] | p | |
Neighborhood resident & housing characteristics |
||||||||||||
Resident characteristics | ||||||||||||
Population density | 1.10 | [0.93–1.29] | 0.99 | [0.65–1.53] | 0.53 | [0.33–0.84] | ** | 0.30 | [0.10–0.87] | * | ||
Racial/ethnic minorities | ||||||||||||
% Hispanic | 1.07 | [0.90–1.28] | 0.86 | [0.52–1.44] | 0.20 | [0.10–0.39] | *** | 1.18 | [0.35–3.91] | |||
% African American/Black | 1.34 | [1.19–1.51] | *** | 0.79 | [0.54–1.17] | 0.76 | [0.46–1.24] | 0.37 | [0.05–2.67] | |||
% Asian | 0.61 | [0.46–0.81] | ** | 1.17 | [0.61–2.23] | 0.73 | [0.46–1.17] | 0.46 | [0.06–3.41] | |||
% w/o high school diploma | 1.06 | [0.89–1.26] | 0.77 | [0.46–1.30] | 0.21 | [0.11–0.43] | *** | 0.68 | [0.10–4.58] | |||
% Unemployed | 1.17 | [1.01–1.36] | * | 1.46 | [1.02–2.07] | * | 0.69 | [0.47–1.00] | 0.52 | [0.21–1.29] | ||
% Below poverty | 1.22 | [1.04–1.42] | * | 0.89 | [0.59–1.34] | 0.56 | [0.35–0.89] | * | 0.81 | [0.33–1.98] | ||
Housing characteristics | ||||||||||||
Median home value | 0.79 | [0.65–0.97] | * | 1.23 | [0.84–1.82] | 3.01 | [2.20–4.10] | *** | 1.35 | [0.67–2.74] | ||
Vacancy rate | 1.08 | [0.94–1.23] | 0.96 | [0.61–1.51] | 1.12 | [0.97–1.30] | 1.29 | [0.94–1.78] | ||||
Availability of alcohol outlets | ||||||||||||
Number of bars | 0.95 | [0.80–1.14] | 1.40 | [1.04–1.90] | * | 1.30 | [1.10–1.53] | ** | 1.07 | [0.79–1.45] | ||
Number of off-premises outlets | 1.16 | [0.99–1.35] | 1.10 | [0.84–1.45] | 1.38 | [1.06–1.79] | * | 0.84 | [0.55–1.29] | |||
Accessibility of recovery resources | ||||||||||||
Number of treatment facilities | 1.32 | [1.17–1.49] | *** | 1.16 | [1.09–1.24] | *** | 1.25 | [1.06–1.47] | ** | 1.05 | [0.81–1.36] | |
Number of AA meetings | 1.13 | [1.01–1.28] | * | 1.15 | [1.01–1.31] | * | 1.19 | [1.00–1.41] | * | 0.92 | [0.70–1.22] | |
Number of other self-help meetings | 1.22 | [1.10–1.36] | *** | 1.12 | [0.95–1.32] | 1.13 | [0.92–1.40] | 0.70 | [0.38–1.31] |
Notes. All models included a spatial lag covariate (rho) representing the spatially-lagged dependent variable. Rho was significant on all bivariate logistic regression models. All zero-truncated Poisson regression models included an exposure variable representing the natural log of the total number of housing units in the neighborhood (constrained to 1) as well as a rho. Rho was not significant in models predicting number of affordable SLHs but was significant in model predicting numbers of high-cost SLHs.
p<0.05;
p<0.01;
p<0.001