Table 3.

Spatially-lagged Multivariate Hurdle Models Examining Correlates of Affordable SLHs

	OR	[95% CI]	p
Logistic regression model examining correlates of any affordable SLHs (N=2332)
% Black	1.22	[1.07– 1.39]	**
% Asian	0.75	[0.57– 0.98]	*
% Unemployed	0.99	[0.83– 1.19]
% Below poverty	1.04	[0.85– 1.26]
Median home value	0.89	[0.72– 1.10]
Number of treatment facilities	1.21	[1.07– 1.38]	**
Number of AA meetings	1.07	[0.93– 1.24]
Number of other self-help meetings	1.13	[1.00– 1.28]
Rho (spatially-lagged affordable SLH indicator)	17.94	[5.52– 58.28]	***
Constant	0.04	[0.03– 0.06]	***
	IRR	[95% CI]	p
Zero-truncated Poisson model examining correlates of affordable SLHs density among neighborhoods with affordable SLHs (N=147)
% Unemployed	1.40	[0.94– 2.08]
Number of bars	1.02	[0.65– 1.58]
Number of treatment facilities	1.12	[1.00– 1.26]	*
Number of AA meetings	1.07	[0.89– 1.29]
Rho (spatially-lagged affordable SLH density)	1.23	[0.24– 6.34]
Constant	0.00	[0.00– 0.00]	***
Exposure (log of total housing units)	1.00

^*p<0.05;

^**p<0.01;

^***p<0.001