Table 4.
OR | [95% CI] | p | |
Logistic regression model examining correlates of any high-cost SLHs (N=2332) | |||
Population density | 0.99 | [0.61– 1.59] | |
% Hispanic | 0.55 | [0.18– 1.66] | |
% w/o high school diploma | 0.75 | [0.22– 2.55] | |
% Below poverty | 1.24 | [0.74– 2.09] | |
Median home value | 2.44 | [1.59– 3.73] | *** |
Number of bars | 1.21 | [0.97– 1.51] | |
Number of off-premises alcohol outlets | 1.24 | [0.92– 1.67] | |
Number of treatment facilities | 1.27 | [1.06– 1.54] | * |
Number of AA meetings | 0.99 | [0.80– 1.24] | |
Rho (spatially-lagged high-cost SLH indicator variable) | 80.66 | [11.89–547.10] | *** |
Constant | 0.00 | [0.00– 0.01] | *** |
IRR | [95% CI] | p | |
Zero-truncated Poisson model examining correlates of counts of high-cost SLHs among neighborhoods with high-cost SLHs (N=49) |
|||
Population density | 0.30 | [0.10– 0.87] | * |
Rho (spatially-lagged high-cost SLH density) | 2.73 | [1.25– 5.94] | * |
Constant | 0.00 | [0.00– 0.00] | *** |
Exposure (log of total housing units) | 1.00 |
p<0.05;
p<0.01;
p<0.001