Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 23;7:1429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01429

Table 4.

Candidate factors of referential choice.

(1) Referent’s factors
  • • Animacy: animate, inanimate, collective (for such entities as organizations)

  • • Gender (for animate referents only): masculine, feminine, mixed (for groups of people with various or unspecified gender)

  • • Person: 1, 2, 3

  • • Number: singular, plural

  • • Protagonism: numeric value

(2) Anaphor’s factors
  • • Ordinal number of referent mention in the referential chain: integer

  • • Type of phrase: noun phrase, prepositional phrase

  • • Grammatical role: subject, direct object, indirect object, oblique (with preposition), attribute, ’s-genitive, of-genitive, postpositive specification

(3) Antecedent’s factors
  • • Type of phrase (values same as in the section “Anaphor’s factors”)

  • • Grammatical role (values same as in the section “Anaphor’s factors”)

  • • Referential form:

    • ∘ pronoun: personal, possessive, demonstrative, relative, zero

    • ∘ description: a-description, the-description, bare description, demonstrative description, possessive description

      • ∘ attributive

      • ∘ numeral

    • ∘ proper name: first, last, first and last, initials and last, non-person, acronym

    • ∘ Antecedent length, in words: integer

(4) Distances between anaphor and antecedent
  • • Distance in words: integer

  • • Distance in all markables: integer

  • • Number of markables in chain from the anaphor back to the nearest full NP antecedent: integer

  • • Linear distance in EDUs: integer

  • • Rhetorical distance (RhD) in elementary discourse units: integer

  • • Distance in sentences: integer

  • • Distance in paragraphs: integer