Table 3.
Left side |
Right side |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peak saccade velocity (°/s) | % of response in SHIMP | HVOR gain HIMP | Peak saccade velocity (°/s) | % of response in SHIMP | HVOR gain HIMP | ||
BVL | Patient 1 | 180 | 50 | 0.38 | 73 | 27 | 0.32 |
Patient 2 | 13 | 5 | 0.03 | 10 | 5 | 0.01 | |
Patient 3 | 175 | 9 | 0.21 | 55 | 25 | 0.17 | |
Patient 4 | 173 | 23 | 0.27 | 105 | 45 | 0.09 | |
Patient 5 | 64 | 64 | 0.30 | 31 | 14 | 0.20 | |
Patient 6 | 20 | 65 | 0.28 | 86 | 35 | 0.50 | |
Mean ± SD | 104 ± 81* | 36 ± 27* | 0.25 ± 0.12* | 60 ± 35* | 25 ± 14* | 0.22 ± 0.17* | |
Normal | Mean ± SD | 347 ± 66 | 100 ± 0 | 0.89 ± 0.08 | 346 ± 61 | 100 ± 0 | 1.03 ± 0.10 |
Notice the significantly lower anti-compensatory peak saccade velocity and percentage of response in SHIMPs and significantly lower HIMP HVOR gain on both sides of BVL patients compared with the corresponding sides in normal subjects.
*indicates significantly difference in t-test, p < 0.05.