Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 23;7:160. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00160

Table 3.

Peak saccade velocity, percentage of response in SHIMPs, and HIMP VOR gain in both sides of BVL patients and normal subjects.

Left side
Right side
Peak saccade velocity (°/s) % of response in SHIMP HVOR gain HIMP Peak saccade velocity (°/s) % of response in SHIMP HVOR gain HIMP
BVL Patient 1 180 50 0.38 73 27 0.32
Patient 2 13 5 0.03 10 5 0.01
Patient 3 175 9 0.21 55 25 0.17
Patient 4 173 23 0.27 105 45 0.09
Patient 5 64 64 0.30 31 14 0.20
Patient 6 20 65 0.28 86 35 0.50

Mean ± SD 104 ± 81* 36 ± 27* 0.25 ± 0.12* 60 ± 35* 25 ± 14* 0.22 ± 0.17*
Normal Mean ± SD 347 ± 66 100 ± 0 0.89 ± 0.08 346 ± 61 100 ± 0 1.03 ± 0.10

Notice the significantly lower anti-compensatory peak saccade velocity and percentage of response in SHIMPs and significantly lower HIMP HVOR gain on both sides of BVL patients compared with the corresponding sides in normal subjects.

*indicates significantly difference in t-test, p < 0.05.