Abstract
Bacteria of the genus Stenotrophomonas are ubiquitous in the environment and are increasingly associated with insects. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia SBo1 was cultured from the gut of Bactrocera oleae. The draft genome sequence presented here will inform future investigations into the nature of the interaction between insects and their microbiota.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Members of the genus Stenotrophomonas reside in a broad range of environments and are commonly identified as multidrug-resistant opportunistic pathogens of humans (1). However, they are most frequently found in soils or in association with plants (2), where they are able to form symbiotic interactions (3). Stenotrophomonas spp. are also associated with multiple insect species (4–8), including three members of the Bactrocera, B. cucurbitae, B. tau, and B. zonata (9, 10). Due to a lack of phenotypic data, the nature of these interactions is not understood. However, the draft genome sequence of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia SBo1 presented here will aid future investigations into the mechanisms that underlie insect-microbe interactions and will contribute to a community-level examination of the B. oleae microbiota (11).
S. maltophilia SBo1 was cultured from the homogenate of 10 dissected guts from surface-sterilized adult B. oleae. Guts were homogenized in Schneider’s insect medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and spread onto brain heart infusion (BHI) agar plates. Plates were incubated at 25°C for 48 h and individual colonies were subsequently streaked on to BHI plates and again incubated at 25°C for 48 h. DNA was isolated from single colonies by boiling at 95°C for 5 min and used as the template for PCR of the 16S rRNA gene with the primers A16SF (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and B16SR (5′-CCCCTACGGTTACCTTGTTACGAC-3′). Sanger sequencing was performed on the resulting fragment to identify the genus of bacterium as Stenotrophomonas. Single colonies were inoculated in to BHI broth and incubated at 25°C for 48 h and genomic DNA was extracted using the Zymo Quick DNA universal kit (Zymo) following the manufacturer’s instructions for biological fluids and cells. The following amendments to the protocol were employed: samples were incubated with proteinase K at 55°C for 30 min rather than 10 min and were eluted twice in a volume of 40 µl to give a total of 80 µl per sample. Library preparation was performed with the NEBNext Ultra DNA library preparation kit (New England Biolabs) following the manufacturers’ instructions, and sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer at the Centre for Genomic Research, University of Liverpool, with paired-end 250-bp reads.
The resulting 2,512,754 reads were assembled with SPAdes version 3.7.1 (12). SPAdes generated a 4.8-Mb assembly comprising 23 contigs with an N50 of 466,519 and an average GC content of 66.1%. Genes were annotated using PROKKA version 1.5.2 (13), which produced a total of 4330 protein coding and 92 RNA genes.
Accession number(s).
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number MANU00000000. The version described in this paper is version MANU01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The sequencing was carried out at the Centre for Genomic Research, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.
This work was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC); Oxitec Ltd. through an iCASE studentship BB/K501773/1 awarded to A.C.D.; and “ARISTEIA” Action of the “Operational Programme Education and Lifelong Learning” and is cofunded by the European Social Fund (ESF) and National Resources (code number 4937) to J.V. The funders had no role in the study design, data analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Citation Blow F, Vontas J, Darby AC. 2016. Draft genome sequence of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia SBo1 isolated from Bactrocera oleae. Genome Announc 4(5):e00905-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00905-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Looney WJ, Narita M, Mühlemann K. 2009. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an emerging opportunist human pathogen. Lancet Infect Dis 9:312–323. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ryan RP, Monchy S, Cardinale M, Taghavi S, Crossman L, Avison MB, Berg G, van der Lelie D, Dow JM. 2009. The versatility and adaptation of bacteria from the genus Stenotrophomonas. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:514–525. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Berg G, Martinez JL. 2015. Friends or foes: can we make a distinction between beneficial and harmful strains of the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex?. Front Microbiol 6:241. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gouveia C, Asensi MD, Zahner V, Rangel EF, de Oliveira SM. 2008. Study on the bacterial midgut microbiota associated to different Brazilian populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Lutz & neiva) (Diptera: Psychodidae). Neotrop Entomol 37:597–601. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2008000500016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hughes GL, Raygoza Garay JA, Koundal V, Rasgon JL, Mwangi MM. 2016. Genome sequence of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain SmAs1, isolated from the Asian malaria mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Genome Announc 4(2):e00086-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00086-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Indiragandhi P, Anandham R, Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Kim GH, Saravanan VS, Sa T. 2007. Cultivable bacteria associated with larval gut of prothiofos resistant, prothiofos susceptible and field-caught populations of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella and their potential for, antagonism towards entomopathogenic fungi and host insect nutrition. J Appl Microbiol 103:2664–2675. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03506.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kikuchi Y, Hosokawa T, Fukatsu T. 2011. An ancient but promiscuous host-symbiont association between Burkholderia gut symbionts and their heteropteran hosts. ISME J 5:446–460. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Morales-Jiménez J, Zúñiga G, Villa-Tanaca L, Hernández-Rodríguez C. 2009. Bacterial community and nitrogen fixation in the red turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus valens LeConte (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Microb Ecol 58:879–891. doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9548-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sood P, Nath A. 2002. Bacteria associated with Bactrocera sp. (Diptera: Tephritidae)-isolation and identification. Pest Manag Econ J Zool 10:1–9. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Naaz N, Choudhary JS, Prabhakar CS, Moanaro, Maurya S. 2016. Identification and evaluation of cultivable gut bacteria associated with peach fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Phytoparasitica 44:165–176. doi: 10.1007/s12600-016-0518-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Blow F, Gioti A, Starns D, Ben-Yosef M, Pasternak Z, Jurkevitch E, Vontas J, Darby AC. Draft genome sequence of the Bactrocera oleae symbiont Candidatus Erwinia dacicola. Genome Announc, in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, Gurevich A, Korobeynikov A, Lapidus A, Prjibelsky A, Pyshkin A, Sirotkin A, Sirotkin Y, Stepanauskas R. 2013. Assembling genomes and mini-metagenomes from highly chimeric reads. Res Comput Mol Biol 20:158–170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]