Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2011 Jun;25(2):365–371. doi: 10.1037/a0022797

Table 2.

CDT Usage and its Relationship to Abstinence among CDT Participants (n=151)

Module % of participants who accessed module Mean number of times accessed
(SD; range)
7 day point prevalence (completers)
OR (CI)
p
7 day point prevalence (intent-to-treat)
OR (CI)
p
Managing My Urge 94.0 14.3 (17.9; 0–121) 1.02 (0.99–1.03)
0.07
1.02 (0.99–1.03)
0.06
Motivational Messages 90.1 23.1 (31.1; 0–148) 1.01 (0.99–1.02)
0.24
1.01 (0.99–1.01)
0.31
Treatment Information 86.8 6.7 (7.9; 0–51) 1.02 (0.98–1.07)
0.25
1.02 (0.98–1.06)
0.27
CDT Total Access 96.0 44.2 (46.3; 0–279) 1.01 (0.99–1.01)
0.09
1.01 (0.99–1.01)
0.11

Note: CDT = computer-delivered treatment.