Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 28;2016(8):CD008815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008815.pub4

Espey 2000.

Methods Design: retrospective chart review
Location: 3 Indian Health Service facilities in southwestern USA
Time frame: first injection of DMPA from December 1992 to June 1995
Sample size estimation and outcome of focus: no information
Participants Female members of Navajo tribe
Inclusion criteria: 18 to 40 years old; completed at least 5 consecutive injections of DMPA at 10‐ to 14‐week intervals; had weights recorded at 1‐ or 2‐year intervals
Exclusion criteria: history of diabetes or thyroid disease; women in postpartum group who had pre‐eclampsia or multiple gestations within index pregnancy
Interventions DMPA initiation
 1) Interval (N = 115): first injection ≥ 20 weeks past pregnancy of ≥ 20 weeks gestation
 2) Postpartum (N = 57): first injection at 5 to 8 weeks after delivery of singleton pregnancy of ≥ 20 weeks gestation
Outcomes Mean weight gain (lb) for DMPA by initiation group
Time frame: 1 and 2 years
Notes For another group, not included in this review, investigators reportedly extracted method of contraception from charts but did not provide specifics. Discussion noted that group "more frequently used" IUC or tubal ligation and included COC users.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk DMPA users by choice
NOS selection (NRS) Low risk Exposed: clinic population of Navajo women
Non‐exposed: same population as exposed
Exposure: clinic records of DMPA injections
NOS comparability (NRS) Low risk Analysis: adjusted for age, parity, and initial weight
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not feasible due to differences in insertion times
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information; objective outcome measure
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Loss to follow‐up: for 1 year, only complete records included in retrospective review; does not account for discontinuation and loss; at 2 years, no weight data for 70% of interval group and 49% of postpartum group