Table 1.
Summary of methods used to develop a core outcome set
| Phase 1 | Identification of all outcomes that may be measured following reconstructive breast surgery |
| Systematic literature searches to identify clinical outcomes, patient‐reported and cosmetic outcomes | |
| Qualitative interviews with patients and healthcare professionals regarding which outcomes they feel should be measured following reconstructive breast surgery | |
| This produces a list of all potential outcomes | |
| The list is grouped into outcome domains to avoid repetition | |
| The domains inform questionnaire items to use in phase 2 | |
| Phase 2 | Prioritization of outcomes by key stakeholders – Delphi survey |
| Stakeholders are surveyed and asked to prioritize each outcome | |
| Results of the survey are fed back to stakeholders in a second survey (Delphi methods) and they are asked to reprioritize each outcome | |
| Data are analysed by the research group using predefined criteria to reduce the list of information | |
| This produces two outcome lists (from patients and healthcare professionals) ready for phase 3 | |
| Phase 3 | Consensus meetings are held separately with key stakeholder groups |
| The items are presented to each group and items are rated as, ‘in’, ‘out’ or ‘unsure’ during anonymized voting | |
| Items rated as ‘unsure’ are discussed and more voting is undertaken | |
| The process produces two sets (1 selected by patients, 1 by professionals). These are compared and combined into one outcome set |