Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Precis Eng. 2016 Apr 2;46:88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.04.003

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

(a) Results of repeated cone angle measurements on twenty-seven pipettes. (b) With 95% confidence, the first and second measurements differed by less than 5.45°, making the conservative approximation that errors were normally distributed; however, (c) errors were in fact bimodally distributed.