Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 20;10(5):054106. doi: 10.1063/1.4963103

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7.

(a) Experimental results depicting the relationship between the acoustic streaming velocity Udc and the modulation index m at three different modulation frequencies fm = 5 kHz (◇), fm = 50 kHz (△), and fm = 100 kHz (×) in a 5 μl droplet suspended with 6 μm particles. The power is fixed at We = 20 mW. The dotted lines represent least square fit—R2 = 0.999 (◇), R2 = 1.000 (△), and R2 = 0.999 (×)—and suggests that Udc10m, consistent with that shown in Fig. 6. (b) Experimental results showing the relationship between the acoustic streaming velocity Udc and the modulation frequency fm at two different powers We = 92 mW (×) and We = 156 mW (○) in a 5 μl droplet suspended with 6 μm particles. The case fm = 0 represents the condition in the absence of amplitude modulation. The piezoelectric substrate is excited by 30.5 kHz SAWs. Error bars indicate a ±2 standard deviation (95% confidence level) from the mean. Trendlines in (b) were added to aid visualization.