Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 23;54(10):2530–2537. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01052-16

TABLE 2.

Turnaround times and costs associated with norovirus genotyping by PCR and Sanger sequencing versus SureSelect target enrichment full-genome sequencing

Genotyping method Hands-on time (h) Total turnaround time (days) Reagent costs per sample (£)
PCR and Sanger sequencinga 7 3 32
Full-genome sequencing with SureSelect target enrichment 11.5 6 86–93b
a

PCR amplification of three sites of interest for norovirus genotyping, i.e., RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, capsid shell domain, and capsid P2 domain, including one round of nested PCR, assuming that the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and capsid shell domain targets are amplified and sequenced simultaneously.

b

Costs based on batches of 96 or 48 samples and sequencing with an Illumina MiSeq system.